Vitiligo: Current Therapies and Future Treatments (2024)

Treating Patients with Active Disease

Vitiligo is a chronic condition that often progresses in flare-ups. It is impossible to predict the long-term evolution of vitiligo, and to date there are no reliable biological markers of activity. However, clinical signs of disease activity have been identified, such as inflammatory borders, the Koebner phenomenon, hypochromic areas/borders, and confetti-like depigmentation. It is essential to detect active forms of vitiligo because a treatment aiming to block flare-ups must be initiated urgently [3–7].

While data are primarily based on open or retrospective studies, it is now widely accepted that the treatment for patients with highly progressive disease should combine systemic therapies and phototherapy [8]. To date, the systemic therapy mainly relies on mini-pulses of systemic steroids for 3 to 6 months (e.g methylprednisolone 16mg (or dexamethasone 5mg) two consecutive days in adults, the dose should be adapted for children) [9]. For children in the growth phase, a paediatric advice should be given after 3 months of treatment. Systemic steroids should be combined with phototherapy: e.g Narrow band UVB 2–3 times/week for 6 months. This combination blocks relapses in over 80% of cases. In small children, phototherapy cannot be used and the mini-pulses are used as a monotherapy. Depending on the season, moderate but regular exposure to the sun is recommended to stimulate repigmentation.

Treatment for Patients with a Stable Disease

With current strategies, complete or near complete repigmentation could be achieved (e.g. 70 to 80% of repigmentation of lesions located on the face; 50% of repigmentation of lesions located on the body; hands and/or feet remain difficult to treat). Importantly, the treatment should be evaluated after at least 6 months. Indeed, it can take between 6 to 24 months of treatment to achieve significant repigmentation. Patients must be clearly warned that the treatment is long and often tedious, as many patients stop the treatment after 1 to 2 months without seeing any results.

Topical immunomodulatory treatments are important. On the face and other sensitive areas, tacrolimus 0.1% (including in infants) or pimecrolimus 1% should be used twice a day. Unfortunately, this prescription is still off-label despite numerous very robust methodological studies [10,11]. On the body, a strong topical steroid can be used instead of tacrolimus, once a day, preferably in the evening, and sequentially (e.g. 5 days a week) [12]. The topical JAK-inhibitor ruxolitinib is the first treatment approved for vitiligo both in US and Europe for the management of vitiligo affecting the face and less than 10% of the body surface area for adults and adolescents (≥12 years old). Two randomized, double blind, phase III studies were conducted in 674 patients. Patients applied ruxolitinib cream 1.5% twice a day. Response rates were much better than in the placebo group, with 50.3% and 74.6% of patients achieving a Facial-VASI (F-VASI) 75 and 50, respectively, at week 52. Moreover, 51.1% of patients achieved a total VASI (T-VASI) of 50 at week 52 [13]. Head and neck responded the best, followed by upper and lower limbs, and by trunk. Hands and feet remained the most difficult areas to repigment. Interestingly, all the areas, excepted for hands and feet, did not reach a plateau, suggesting that longer treatment will allow further improvement that was confirmed in long-term extension studies. Adverse events were mainly mild or moderate. The most common adverse events were acneiform reactions located on site of the application as well as pruritus. Clinical trials are ongoing to see whether the efficacy could be better in combination with UV lights (NCT05247489).

Indeed, currently, without UV (whether natural, cabin, lamp or laser), the repigmentation is long to obtain. If possible, UVB should be preferred to PUVA therapy. For localized vitiligo, excimer lamps and lasers are of great interest [14–17]. It is important to note that there are now narrow spectrum UVB lamps available that are finally affordable for patients [18,19]. These lamps allow home phototherapy and are very useful for localized lesions of vitiligo. Sun exposure can be offered during the summer season. Patients should be advised to expose moderately themselves at least 3 or 4 times a week, without sunscreen, until their skin turns pink.

A combination of sun exposure with immunomodulating agents is crucial to achieve good repigmentation. There are now well-established recommendations for using phototherapy in patients with vitiligo [17]. Regarding the sun exposure in patients with vitiligo, it is important to note that patients with vitiligo have a lower risk of developing skin cancer and in particular a lower risk of developing melanoma. There is also no increased risk of skin cancer with narrow-spectrum UVB phototherapy in vitiligo (up to at least 400 sessions). In addition, no increased risk of skin cancers has been shown if NB-UVB is combined with tacrolimus [20–22].

What is the Place of Melanocyte-Grafting?

Transplants have two main indications in vitiligo. They can be proposed after the failure of medical treatments for: vitiligo that has been stable for at least 12 months and segmental vitiligo.

Several techniques have been described: – epidermal suspensions; – epidermal suction and then grafting; – thin skin grafting; – mini-grafting; – in vitro culture of keratinocyte and melanocyte suspensions. Epidermal suspensions are preferred and now approved commercial tissue-dissociation kits can be used in the clinic [23,24].

How can Recurrences be Prevented?

Almost 50% of vitiligo lesions recur in the first year after repigmentation without a maintenance therapy [25]. For instance for the face, it has been shown than the use of tacrolimus 0.1% twice weekly (without the need of sun exposure) reduces the risk of relapse from 40% to 9.7% [26]. Topical steroids on the same schedule are probably also effective but this has not been yet demonstrated. For patients with a larger extent of the disease, the use of NB-UVB once or twice a month as a maintenance treatment could be discussed [17]. However, data supporting this procedure are still lacking. Some systemic treatments currently under development may be of interest to block the recurrence of vitiligo.

When and How to Propose Depigmentation?

Depigmentation can be discussed for patients with depigmented areas affecting more than 50% of the body. Chemical depigmenting products such as MEBH (hydroquinone monobenzylether) are no longer available in most of European countries. Depigmenting lasers have shown similar approximately a 70% success rate after 1 to 3 sessions. Maintenance sessions after the summer are often necessary, especially on light exposed areas such as the face. For small areas, cryotherapy is an interesting option [27,28].

Future Therapies in Development

Vitiligo patients can be strongly encouraged to participate in the latest clinical trials to promote the development of new and more efficient therapies. Besides the approval of topical ruxolitinib both in US and Europe, the oral JAK inhibitors baracitinib (a JAK1/2 inhibitor), upadacitinib and povorcitinib (JAK1 inhibitors are currently being tested in phase II ongoing trials. Ritlecitinib (a JAK3/TEC inhibitor) was recently evaluated with different doses in a phase II trial that included 364 patients [29]. After 24 weeks, the proportion of F-VASI change from baseline was significantly different in the ritlecitinib 50 mg group compared to placebo for the with (−21.2% vs 2.1%, P<0.001). Strategies to target IL-15 or its receptor CD122 to inhibit the generation and the maintenance of skin resident memory T cells demonstrated durable treatment responses in a pre-clinical mouse model of vitiligo and clinical trials using this strategy are under way [30]. Blocking the initiation of the disease could be also an important step for future therapies in vitiligo. HP70i seems to be a critical Danger Associated Molecular Pattern (DAMP) important for the initiation of the disease. Blocking HSP70i activity might offer a good strategy as shown in pre-clinical animal models [31–33]. Preventing melanocyte detachment by using matrix metalloproteinase-9 inhibitors could also be effective [34]. Recent data suggest a dysbiosis in the skin and the gut of vitiligo patients. Modulating the vitiligo microbiome offers potential new strategies [35]. In addition, to induce a better repigmentation, it will be important to combine topical and/or oral immunomodulators with strategies that will promote the differentiation and proliferation of melanocyte stem cells in vitiligo lesions, especially located on acral areas or in areas with poliosis [36]. In this line, the WNT signaling, which is repressed in depigmented skin of vitiligo patients, may be an important pathway to target to induce melanocyte differentiation.

Competing Interests: Julien Seneschal: received grants and/or honoraria from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Calypso Biotech, Eli Lilly, Incyte, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, Sun Pharmaceuticals, and Viela Bio; and has a patent on MMP9 inhibitors and uses thereof in the prevention or treatment of a depigmenting disorder and three-dimensional model of depigmenting disorder. Katia Boniface: received grants from Calypso Biotech, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Sanofi, and has a patent on MMP9 inhibitors and uses thereof in the prevention or treatment of a depigmenting disorder and three-dimensional model of depigmenting disorder.

Authorship: Both the authors have contributed significantly to this publication.

Funding: None.

1. Geel N, Speeckaert R, Taïeb A, et al. Worldwide expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management of vitiligo: Position statement from the International Vitiligo Task Force Part 1: towards a new management algorithm. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Seneschal J, Speeckaert R, Taïeb A, et al. Worldwide expert recommendations for the diagnosis and management of vitiligo: Position statement from the international Vitiligo Task Force—Part 2: Specific treatment recommendations. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2023 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Zhang L, Chen S, Kang Y, et al. Association of Clinical Markers With Disease Progression in Patients With Vitiligo From China. Jama Dermatol. 2020;156 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Sosa JJ, Currimbhoy SD, Ukoha U, et al. Confetti-like depigmentation: A potential sign of rapidly progressing vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73:272–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. vanGeel N, Speeckaert R, Wolf JD, et al. Clinical significance of Koebner phenomenon in vitiligo. Brit J Dermatol. 2012;167:1017–24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. vanGeel N, Grine L, Wispelaere PD, Mertens D, Prinsen CAC, Speeckaert R. Clinical visible signs of disease activity in vitiligo: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019;33:1667–75. doi:10.1111/jdv.15604. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

7. vanGeel N, Passeron T, Wolkerstorfer A, Speeckaert R, Ezzedine K. Reliability and validity of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) Brit J Dermatol. 2020 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Passeron T. Medical and Maintenance Treatments for Vitiligo. Dermatol Clin. 2017;35:163–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Tovar-Garza A, Hinojosa JA, Hynan LS, Pandya AG. Addition of oral minipulse dexamethasone to narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy and topical steroids helps arrest disease activity in patients with vitiligo. The British journal of dermatology. 2019;180:193–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Passeron T, Ostovari N, Zakaria W, et al. Topical tacrolimus and the 308-nm excimer laser: a synergistic combination for the treatment of vitiligo. Arch Dermatol. 2004;140:1065–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Seneschal J, Duplaine A, Maillard H, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Tacrolimus 0.1% for the Treatment of Facial Vitiligo: A Multicenter Randomized, Double-Blinded, Vehicle-Controlled Study. J Investig Dermatol. 2021;141:1728–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Lepe V, Moncada B, Castanedo-Cazares JP, Torres-Alvarez MB, Ortiz CA, Torres-Rubalcava AB. A double-blind randomized trial of 0.1% tacrolimus vs 0.05% clobetasol for the treatment of childhood vitiligo. Archives of Dermatology. 2003;139:581–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Rosmarin D, Passeron T, Pandya AG, et al. Two Phase 3, Randomized, Controlled Trials of Ruxolitinib Cream for Vitiligo. New Engl J Med. 2022;387:1445–55. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Esmat SM, El-Mofty M, Rasheed H, et al. Efficacy of narrow band UVB with or without OMP in stabilization of vitiligo activity in skin photo-types (III–V): A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective, multicenter study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2021 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Esmat S, Hegazy RA, Shalaby S, Hu SC-S, Lan C-CE. Phototherapy and Combination Therapies for Vitiligo. Dermatologic clinics. 2017;35:171–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Esmat S, Mostafa W, Hegazy RA, et al. Phototherapy: The vitiligo management pillar. Clin Dermatol. 2016;34:594–602. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Mohammad TF, Al-Jamal M, Hamzavi IH, et al. The Vitiligo Working Group recommendations for narrowband ultraviolet B light phototherapy treatment of vitiligo. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 2017;76:879–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Mohammad TF, Silpa-Archa N, Griffith JL, Lim HW, Hamzavi IH. Home phototherapy in vitiligo. Photodermatology, Photoimmunology & Photomedicine. 2017;33:241–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Batchelor JM, Millington A, Thomas KS, et al. Home-based narrowband UVB, topical corticosteroid or combination for children and adults with vitiligo: HI-Light Vitiligo three-arm RCT. Heal Technol Assess. 2020;24:1–128. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Teulings HE, Overkamp M, Ceylan E, et al. Decreased risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer in patients with vitiligo: a survey among 1307 patients and their partners. British Journal of Dermatology. 2012;168:162–71. doi:10.1111/bjd.12111. [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

21. Bae JM, Ju HJ, Lee RW, et al. Evaluation for Skin Cancer and Precancer in Patients With Vitiligo Treated With Long-term Narrowband UV-B Phototherapy. Jama Dermatol. 2020;156:529–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Ju HJ, Han JH, Kim M-S, et al. The long-term risk of lymphoma and skin cancer was not increased after topical calcineurin inhibitor use and phototherapy in a cohort of 25,694 patients with vitiligo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Mohammad TF, Hamzavi IH. Surgical Therapies for Vitiligo. Dermatologic clinics. 2017;35:193–203. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

24. Ju HJ, Bae JM, Lee RW, et al. Surgical Interventions for Patients With Vitiligo. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157:307–16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

25. Nicolaidou E, Antoniou C, Stratigos AJ, Stefanaki C, Katsambas AD. Efficacy, predictors of response, and long-term follow-up in patients with vitiligo treated with narrowband UVB phototherapy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56:274–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

26. Cavalié M, Ezzedine K, Fontas E, et al. Maintenance therapy of adult vitiligo with 0.1% tacrolimus ointment: a randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled study. The Journal of investigative dermatology. 2015;135:970–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

27. Komen L, Zwertbroek L, Burger SJ, Veen JPW, Rie MA, Wolkerstorfer A. Q-switched laser depigmentation in vitiligo, most effective in active disease. Brit J Dermatol. 2013;169:1246–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

28. MOSHER DB, PARRISH JA, FITZPATRICK TB. Monobenzylether of hydroquinone. Brit J Dermatol. 1977;97:669–79. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

29. Ezzedine K, Peeva E, Yamaguchi Y, et al. Efficacy and safety of oral ritlecitinib for the treatment of active nonsegmental vitiligo: A randomized phase 2b clinical trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88:395–403. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

30. Richmond JM, Strassner JP, Zapata L, et al. Antibody blockade of IL-15 signaling has the potential to durably reverse vitiligo. Sci Transl Med. 2018;10:eaam7710. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

31. Jacquemin C, Rambert J, Guillet S, et al. Heat shock protein 70 potentiates interferon alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells: relevance for cutaneous lupus and vitiligo pathogenesis. The British journal of dermatology. 2017;177:1367–75. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

32. Mosenson JA, Eby JM, Hernandez C, Poole ICL. A central role for inducible heat-shock protein 70 in autoimmune vitiligo. Experimental Dermatology. 2013;22:566–9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

33. Mosenson JA, Zloza A, Nieland JD, et al. Mutant HSP70 Reverses Autoimmune Depigmentation in Vitiligo. Science translational medicine. 2013;5:174ra28–174ra28. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

34. Boukhedouni N, Martins C, Darrigade A-S, et al. Type-1 cytokines regulate matrix metalloprotease-9 production and E-cadherin disruption to promote melanocyte loss in vitiligo. Jci Insight. 2020 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

35. Bzioueche H, Sjödin KS, West CE, et al. Analysis of Matched Skin and Gut Microbiome of Patients with Vitiligo Reveals Deep Skin Dysbiosis: Link with Mitochondrial and Immune Changes. J Invest Dermatol. 2021;141:2280–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

36. Regazzetti C, Joly F, Marty C, et al. Transcriptional Analysis of Vitiligo Skin Reveals the Alteration of WNT Pathway: A Promising Target for Repigmenting Vitiligo Patients. J Invest Dermatol. 2015;135:3105–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]